The Mule and Repentance

There was a farmer that had an old mule that he liked very much. The mule one day fell into a well.  The farmer liked the mule and the well was dry.  He thought that while he liked the mule it was old and the well was he might as well put the mule out of his misery.  The farmer called his neighbors to help him.  They all started to shovel dirt into the well.  The dirt was hitting the back of the mule. At first the mule was afraid.  After awhile the mule started to shake the dirt off its back and step up onto the dirt. The mule continued to do this no matter how painful the blows from the dirt were on his back until the mule stepped out of the well triumphantly.

 

This is how it is when we fall into sin.  We can die in our sin and the further blows from the devil and his demons or we can take the actions necessary to change the course of our lives.  In short repent.  Repentance can be a painful process filled with fear because we are continually assaulted by the powers of evil to keep us buried in sin. In the end if we persevere in our struggle we all can  rise above our sin and walk triumphantly out to meet our Lord God and Savior Jesus Christ!!!

The Shape of the Lord’s Prayer

In biblical studies there has been a group of scholars that have been looking at the shape or the literary structure of scripture to determine more precisely the author’s intended meaning of scriptural passages.

It has been identified that a rhetorical literary structure known as chiasmus is the most frequent literary pattern in both the Old and New Testaments. Chiasmus is a literary form consisting two or more parallel lines structured in a synonymous, antithetical or inverted parallelism around a central theme. This literary structure is not confined to scripture. Chiasmus has been used in various types of literary works in the Semitic and Greek worlds to express feelings of suffering, lament and jubilation, or to transmit promises and warnings.

James Kugel in his book, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, has pointed out that chiasmus is not only an aesthetic symmetry or paralleling around a central theme but a form that advances, heightens, intensifies, specifies, elevates, or seconds the central theme.  This is referred to as the “What’s More” factor or a rhetorical helix. [1] This literary technique draws the attention of the reader to the central theme of the passage.

Chiasmus is a deliberate and intentional method of writing.  It is not just accidental or contrived literary form. We are told to read the scriptures carefully with understanding. If one is unaware of the structure, the cultural nuances, or the historical background of passages of scripture they may miss a deeper understanding of the message in a particular scriptural passage. Translation issues further the difficulties of a deeper understanding of the scripture because the manner in which a passage is translated may cause a chiasmus to go unnoticed or the words selected for the translation may not fully express the words in the original text.

Before looking at the more complicated structure of the Lord’s Prayer the simple example of   1 John 3:9, “No one who is born of God commits sin, for his seed abides in him, and he is not able to commit sin, and he is not able to commit sin, because he is born of God.” will be used to illustrate the parallel rhetorical helix of the chiasmus structure of this verse. When the verse is divided up in the following manner the spiral helical parallel structure that climaxes at the central point of the verse is easily identified.

2:      No one who is born of God

1:      commits sin,

0:      for his seed abides in him,

1’:     and he is not able to commit sin,

2’      because he is born of God.

Using this division the central point of the verse is identified; for his (God’s) seed abides in him. The progression to the central point is 2 to 2’ to 1 to 1’ to 0 illustrating the “What’s More” factor.  Thus this verse may be read No one who is born of God, {for what’s more} because he is born of God commits sin, and{further more} he is not able to commit sin, for {what’s more} his (God’s) seed abides in him. Another structuring of this verse highlighting the central point is 0 to 2 to 1 to 1’ to 2’; Because God’s seed abides in him no one who is born of God commits sin, and he is not able to commit sin, because he is born of God. [2]

Through this example it can be seen how a deeper understanding of scripture can be attained by looking for chiasmus in the structure of scripture.  Chiasmus structure is not restricted to individual verses of scripture.  This structure may be found in passages of scripture and in the complete structure of some of the scriptural books; for example the Gospel of St. John.

The Lord’s Prayer is a passage found in scripture that is part of a much larger passage referred to as the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospels of St. Matthew (6:9-13) and St. Luke (11:1-4). The chiasmus structure of the Lord’s Prayer is a division of the prayer into seven phrases.  This is a normal division used by the Holy Fathers when they comment on the Lord’s Prayer in scripture.

3:      Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name

2:      Thy kingdom come

1:      Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven

0:      give us this day our daily bread

1’:     and forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors

2’:     and lead us not into temptation

3’      but deliver us from the evil one

Looking at the parallel pairings of the chiasmus structure of this prayer it is easily identifiable that the phase pairings are contrasting about the central phrase of give us this day our daily bread.

3 / 3’: Our Father / the evil one

2 / 2’: The age to come / the present age

1 / 1’: The Divine will / the human will

0:        The “daily bread” the super essential bread of life.

Though the contrasting pairings, the eschatological (concerning the end times) progression to the super essential bread of life is seen in the Lord’s Prayer. [3] The Lord’s Prayer is a progression from current times into the eschaton (the eternity in which God lives) to again enter into Paradise and eat from the Tree of Life.  The prayer can also be seen as a reversal of time and events in which man reclaims his glory, lives in the presence of God, man’s will and God’s will are one in the same thing and man is nourished with the Fruit of the Tree of Life making him immortal as God is immortal.

The concept that through Christ mankind reclaims its proper place through His death and resurrection or is moved out of linear time backing into the eternity of God and is now able to partake of the fruit of the Tree of Life is seen in the Kontakion of the Sunday of the Cross during Great Lent

The fiery sword no longer guards the gate of Eden, for in a strange and glorious way the wood of the Cross has quenched its flames. The sting of death and the victory of hell are now destroyed, for Thou art come, my Saviour, crying unto those in hell: Return again into Paradise. [4]

The same concept is again seen in the priestly prayer just before the elevation of the Gifts in the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom.

Remembering this saving commandment and all those things which have come to pass for us: the Cross, the Tomb, the Resurrection on the third day, the Ascension into heaven, the sitting at the right hand and the Second and glorious Coming [5]

The Orthodox Christian lives between linear time and the eschaton or as is frequently said he lives in this world but is not of this world. The Lord’s Prayer confirms this through its structure spiraling man from this world into the next to communion again with God.  The Church responds to this spiraling structure in its theology through many of its prayer of which only two are mentioned above.

The eschatological structure of the Lord’s Prayer through chiasmus points to the restoration of communion between God and man through the central phrase give us this day our “daily bread.” The words “daily bread” are identified as words that illustrate the difficulties of translation; what word should be used to describe the concept from the original language.

The words ἐπιούσιον, in Greek, or насушчниј, in Church Slavonic, are often translated as daily. In the larger context of the phrase meaning of these words takes on the meaning of super essential. The “daily bread” which is referred to in the Lord’s Prayer is in reality the super essential bread of life; the fruit of the tree of life, the bread of the Eucharist, the body and blood of Christ.

Saints Nikodemous the Hagorite, John Chrysostom, Maximus the Confessor, John of Damascus, Cyril of Jerusalem, and many others in their commentaries on the Lord’s Prayer always have the super essential bread of life as the centerpiece of their commentary.[6]  They relate the super essential bread of life to the mystery of Holy Communion.  Christ tells us in the Gospel of John (6:35) that “I am the bread of Life…”  Christ further states at the Last Supper “Take eat this is my body…” (Matthew 26:26, Mark 14:25, Luke 22:19 and 1 Corinthians 24) as he breaks the bread and gives it to the Apostles.

The Lord’s Prayer is not only an eschatological prayer pointing to the restoration of communion between God and man but it is also Eucharistic prayer that points us to a foretaste of the fruit of the Tree of Life through the Mystery of the Holy Eucharist.  This Eschatological- Eucharistic nature is further strengthened by the Church in its placement of the Lord’s Prayer just before the distribution of Holy Communion in the Holy Liturgy.

Through awareness of the chiasmus structure of the Lord’s Prayer a deeper understanding of the prayer is achieved.  That understanding is as the Lord says “When you pray…” leave this world behind and enter into the time of God, be restored to what you were intended to be from the beginning, Taste and See through the Holy Mystery of the Eucharist, and know what it is like to partake of the Fountain of Immortality for you are God’s child the Crown of His creation.

 

[1] Breck, John; The Shape of Biblical Language, Chiasmus and Beyond; St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press; Crestwood, NY; 2008; p. 35

[2] ibid; pp.39-40

[3] ibid pp. 119-123

[4] translated by Mother Mary and Kallistos Ware; The Lenten Triodion; St. Tikohn’s Seminary Press; South Canaan, PA; 2002; pp. 342-343

[5] compiled by Dragicevich, V, Rev. Bozidar; The Divine Liturgy Service Book, Engish, Church Slavonic & Serbian; IIU “Svetigora”; Niksic, Yugoslavia, 2002; p. 68

[6] Nikodemos the Hagorite, translated by Dokos, Fr. George; Concerning Frequent Communion of the Immaculate Mysteries of Christ; Uncut Mountain Press; Dalles, OR; 2006; pp. 57-70.

 

Daily Services What to Do?

We live in a busy world.  We would like to attend services more often but our obligations get in the way.  Sometimes our parishes do not offer daily services, let a lone that we would need to carry a small library with us in order to perform the service without a priest.  Saint Paisios of Mount Athos was not a priest and lived as a hermit; by himself.  Sometimes he had the service books to perform the services by himelf.  More often than not he did not have these books.  So what did he do???

In his life Elder Paisos of Mount Athos by Hieromonk Issac it describes that the saint used to perform the daily services on his broyanitsa (prayer rope).  Upon research this method has been used by those who had responsibilities in the monastery that took them away from the church services or those who were living the ascetical life as a hermit. The following is the method that has been used to perform these services on the broyanitsa.  This should never be used as a method to avoid going to church but a means to increase our constant contact with God.

• Vespers: 600 prayers
• Great Compline: 700 prayers
• Small Compline: 400 prayers
• Midnight Office (Nocturn): 600 prayers
• Matins: 1500 prayers
• The Hours: 1000 prayers (250 prayers for each of the four hours)

Cremation: A Message from St. Nikolai Velimirovic (written in 1956)

You ask me, why is the Orthodox Church against cremation. First of all, because it considers it violent. The Serbs still shudder with the crime of Sinan Pasha, who burned the dead body of St. Sava on Vrachar.

Do people burn dead horses, dogs, cats and monkeys? I have not heard of this. I have heard of and seen them buried. Why should the dead bodies of people who are the lords of all animals on earth endure violence? Would it not be in all respects much more reasonable to incinerate dead animals, especially in big cities, than people?

Second, because this pagan and barbaric habit disappeared from Europe thanks to Christian civilization two thousand years ago. Anyone who wants to reinstate it doesn’t do anything else, neither civilized nor modern nor new, but something ancient which has long expired.

In England, which one can hardly call uncivilized, this form of Neopaganism is very much hated by the people. To tell you a case: during the years of World War II a famous Yugoslav lost his mind. When asked before he died, he said his only desire was to have his body burned.

Our little Yugoslavian community watched as this man was reduced in the incinerator of Golders Green. When the dead body entered the burning furnace we began to tremble with horror. Then they shouted to us on the opposite side of the furnace, “wait a quarter of an hour to see your compatriot in the form of ashes”. We waited over an hour and were mystified why the fire struggled with the dead body, and we asked the stoker about this. He apologized saying the furnace was cold, “it is not heated every day, since rarely do volunteers get handed over to the fire”. Listening to this we were dissolved, unable to wait at the edge for our compatriot. And we know that in London over a thousand human beings die every day.

I am in America, I saw the graves of the great Presidents Wilson, Roosevelt, Lincoln and many other important persons. None of them are cremated. Now this surprised me, that among the descendants of Saint Sava there could be found those who are like-minded with Sinan Pasha!

But why create an issue that has already been solved? If we want to be loaded with unnecessary worries, then someday we could be troubled by the question on whether to kill our decrepit men and women as do some primitive tribes? And we will create clubs to propagate this “idea”!

Finally, what sense is there in fighting the cemeteries, particularly in this country where the cemetery serves as a national pride, as a source of inspiration, and if you will as the book of the state?

Peace to you and health from God.